Why Rebecca (1940) and The Silence of the Lambs (1991) won Best Picture but Get Out (2017) did not.
Why pit Deadgirl (2008) against The Corpse of Anna Fritz (2015)?
Well, they are both about young men who have sex with dead women – a zombie in the former, an expired film star in the latter.
This is not usually my thing, but in the era of #metoo, extreme metaphors for sex crimes feel useful rather than gratuitous.
I made the connection about a week ago when I saw the following tweet:
I was instantly reminded of Deadgirl, even though it’s almost ten years older.
Some people see the films as too similar.
And they are similar. But they are also quite different. The really interesting question is, which one is better? Let’s take a look.
WHAT BINDS THESE FILMS...
Both Deadgirl and The Corpse of Anna Fritz (DG and COAF from hereon) start with young men letting off steam at a hospital.
In DG, Rickie and JT run down the corridors of an abandoned mental asylum breaking windows and throwing trolleys at walls. In COAF Ivan, Javi and Pau drink spirits and snort coke behind the hospital dumpsters.
In both films there’s a conversation between the boys where moral norms are broken down – you can’t just go straight into having sex with a dead/undead girl after all.
In both there’s one boy (JT, Ivan) who is already morally detached and leads the charge towards transgression. There are tensions between this character and another (Rickie, Javi) who is horrified by the idea.
Fear of discovery
In both DG and COAF, the boys are terrified of the outside world knowing what they have done. Maternal figures invoke the greatest fear – JT’s last words are “don’t tell my grandma”, while Pau’s dread of his mother finding out makes him commit murder.
In both, there’s a sense that girls’ minds are difficult, and finding one without a mind is a solution.
In both, the actor playing the girl does most of her acting with her eyes, and this is extraordinarily powerful.
In both, the girl gets her revenge.
…AND WHAT DIVIDES THEM
To decide which film is better, let’s take a look at the differences.
In DG the boys enlist your sympathy. They’re outsiders - born without priviledge into families that are messed up or non-existent. JT’s grotesque attachment to the dead girl gives us a window into his loneliness. Rickie is a vulnerable and trying to do the right thing. When I first saw the film 10 years ago I probably fancied him (NB he doesn't have sex with the girl!). Now that I'm married with two kids I just want to give him a hug and tell him he's doing fine.
Whereas COAF is a nightmarish morality tale with limited characterisation. We never learn anything about the three ‘horndogs’ past. We only get to know them in the context of the morgue. What we see is deeply unpleasant.
In DG the dead girl is a zombie. She survives bullets, strangulation, beatings and a broken neck. She has no reaction to being raped but if you get too close she takes a bite.
Whereas in COAF Anna is actually alive. She’s a real person. She’s not a supernatural conceit or a thought experiment.
DG’s director calls the film a coming of age story. When Rickie realises the dead girl is the best he can expect, he enters into a sad sort of manhood. The dead girl is a catalyst for his - very crooked – development. As such the film isn’t about her, it’s about him. Sex with a woman who cannot consent is a metaphor for the male characters’ stunted lives. The film does condemn this way of relating to women, but only indirectly.
COAF on the other hand whacks you over the head with its message – having sex with a corpse is bad and wrong. The ending – which I won’t give away – suggests the film is really about Anna, not the boys who rape her. It suggests she’s been through something much worse than what happens in the morgue. Essentially that being raped by men who think you’re dead is not that different from the casting couch, and what you’re really seeing is Anna’s previous life.
WHICH FILM IS BETTER?
To sum up, DG is a film for the age of Donald Trump and Brexit, when you choose something you really shouldn’t. It’s a sympathetic portrait of people who are genuinely suffering and make disastrous choices.
COAF is a film for the post-Harvey Weinstein, post-Jimmy Saville age, when it becomes clear a lot of powerful men don’t think women are actually human.
In other words, they’re both equally relevant! HELP! HELP ME DECIDE! This isn’t a gimmick. Ask anyone who knows me, I’m a legendary fence sitter.
Which do you think should win? Deadgirl or The Corpse of Anna Fritz?
UPDATE: click here for the verdict.
His reaction made me think. The film is aggressively shocking and it forces you to be 'in' or 'out'. I felt that it's brilliance justified its style a million times over so I was in. But on reflection I'm not sure you can be 'in' if you are a woman without a bit of discomfort.
Kuso is seductive. You want to be down with it, you want to celebrate it like it's celebrating itself. But then you find you are posting 1970s pornography up on your website...
This is problematic. It doesn't make the film less brilliant, but I'm not going to press it upon my girlfriends. They can find their own way to it if they are want to see it.
I've also removed the trailer, but here is Flying Lotus in his own words and it's pretty unmissable. No beavers either.
I applaud the bravery of all the women coming forwards on social media to talk about the sexual harassment and assaults they have experienced, following the revelations about film producer Harvey Weinstein.
I have to confess something, however, At first, when I saw all this #metoo stuff, it seemed over the top. I've come across plenty of women who are as awful as the worst men. I know lots of men who are honest, kind and fair.
But after a while of reading all these testimonies, I remembered what happened to me. So many times. The kind of stuff you shrug off and forget. Still, I cannot pretend I don't know what all the fuss is about. #metoo